The below quote caught my eye in last week's
Australian Writers' Centre newsletter:
“Writing is not like painting where
you add. It is not what you put on the canvas that the reader sees.
Writing is more like a sculpture where you remove, you eliminate in
order to make the work visible. Even those pages you remove somehow
remain.”
-Elie Wiesel
As a painter, however, I have to
disagree with this statement. I've painted in oils for around 15
years and there is a strong connection between the traditional
process of oil painting and my manuscript writing process. I'm not
one of those write by the seat of your pants kind of writers. I need
to know where I'm going so I can get there. I'll develop the climax
of a book from the outset and then plan the journey. I won't be able
to stop myself from jumping ahead, blocking out the general plot and
scenes in broad strokes before returning to add further detail—much
like the process of oil painting.
I was taught to paint in oils by the
fabulous Fiona Bilbrough. The traditional method is to first cover
the canvas in one colour to form the base of the work. When no white
remains, I'll dip a rag in turps and rub away the paint to reveal the
basic structures of my subject. This is my plan, similar to a rough guide of my novel.
Once the mysterious shape starts to
come to life I'll be compelled to add colour. I'll pick basic tones
to outline different areas, much like the process of fleshing out scenes by adding
dialogue, descriptions and the characters thoughts. During this stage
there will be much adding and subtracting until the structure of the
painting emerges. Painting in oils allows for this mouldable
approach. Nothing is set in stone. I'll rub back the parts that
aren't working, I'll use my medium sized brushes to block in
elements, and work and rework until the image begins to hang
together. This is similar to the process of creating the second to
how-ever-many-drafts-it-takes of a manuscript where I'll push and
pull the language until I hit upon the right sentence, the right
scene, the right emotion. Where no section is left underdeveloped and
each inch of the canvas is worked with the same level finesse.
I'll then use my smallest brushes to
add details: a flick of white to the rim of a metallic bowl, the
cut of the palette knife for the edge of a table, the purest black
added to the shadows. I'll polish the piece until I can run my eyes over the canvas
and no section cries out for more development. Much like when I'll
read through my manuscript and not cringe, question or struggle. It's
ready.
Next I'll go to the framers where
they'll prepare my work for public consumption. Whilst writers and
artists often create for themselves, they also create for an
audience. As a writer I want nothing more than to be told that the
reader enjoyed my story, that they couldn't put it down. This is the
moment I am waiting for.
The painting is hung. People gather.
They stand back. They squint. They lean in close. Their response?
Meh.
That's the worst. I don't want my
audience to be indifferent, I want them to care. A negative reaction is better than none at all. I've spent hours creating this
piece, or in the case of my manuscript: years, and in one brief
moment my work's worth will be decided. All I can do is hope that my
hard work pays off. That someone out there will enjoy my work as much as I've enjoyed creating it.
Two of my still life paintings |
No comments:
Post a Comment